Data illegally harvested from 50 million Facebook users
Use of private data by Cambridge Analytica in attempt to influence US election sparks calls for new regulation
Politicians have demanded answers and action after it emerged more than 50 million Facebook users had data harvested without their consent, which was then used to influence the 2016 US presidential election.
Revelations by whistleblower Chris Wylie, first published in The Observer and The New York Times, suggest private information from more than 50 million users improperly ended up in the hands of Cambridge Analytica, a US-based data analysis firm.
The company, at one time linked to former Trump special advisor Steve Bannon, is “well known for the role it played in President Trump’s election campaign, where it provided intricate data on the thoughts of American voters”, says the BBC.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
While many claim Cambridge Analytica had a decisive impact on the election result by enabling the Trump campaign to target individual voters in key swing states, the revelations of the firm’s tactics raise fresh questions about Facebook’s complicity.
Some 270,000 people agreed to allow a researcher to harvest their data - but the data of all their friends was used as well, something allowed by Facebook until 2015. The researcher sold the data to Cambridge Analytica - and that was against Facebook rules, The Observer says.
The paper describes it as one of Facebook’s “biggest ever data breaches”, with the stolen information used “to build a powerful software program to predict and influence choices at the ballot box”.
Despite suspending Cambridge Analytica from its social media platform on Friday, just hours before the story broke, Facebook yesterday faced new calls for regulation from within the US Congress and was hit with questions about personal data safeguards.
The scrutiny “presented a new threat to Facebook’s reputation”, already eroded by Russia’s alleged use of Facebook tools to sway American voters before and after the 2016 election, reports Reuters.
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey said the state would be launching an investigation, while Democratic Senator Mark Warner said the episode bolstered the need for new regulations about internet advertising, describing the industry as the “Wild West.”
“Whether it’s allowing Russians to purchase political ads, or extensive micro-targeting based on ill-gotten user data, it’s clear that, left unregulated, this market will continue to be prone to deception and lacking in transparency,” he said.
In the UK, the head of the Commons committee investigating fake news accused Cambridge Analytica and Facebook of misleading MPs in testimony.
Damian Collins, chair of the Culture, Media and Sport select committee, said he would ask Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg to testify before MPs.
He also said he would be recalling the Cambridge Analytica CEO, Alexander Nix, to give further testimony and clarify comments made last month, when he told MPs the company did not have or use private Facebook data.
The firm is facing intertwined investigations by MPs and government regulators into allegations it performed illegal work during the Brexit campaign. Britain’s information commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, announced on Saturday she would be looking into whether Facebook data had been “illegally acquired and used”.
CNN reported in October that Cambridge Analytica had contacted WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in 2016 regarding thousands of Hillary Clinton’s emails kept on a private server while she was US secretary of state.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
What does 'Quiet on the Set' mean for the future of kids' TV?
In the Spotlight A new documentary exposes the 'dark underbelly' of Nickelodeon productions
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - March 27, 2024
Cartoons Wednesday's cartoons - Diddy raided, Biden investigated, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Will Aukus pact survive a second Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question US, UK and Australia seek to expand 'game-changer' defence partnership ahead of Republican's possible return to White House
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Russians are filling America's news shortage
Talking Points Fake news sites spread propaganda while real newspapers die
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
It's the economy, Sunak: has 'Rishession' halted Tory fightback?
Today's Big Question PM's pledge to deliver economic growth is 'in tatters' as stagnation and falling living standards threaten Tory election wipeout
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Why your local council may be going bust
The Explainer Across England, local councils are suffering from grave financial problems
By The Week UK Published
-
Rishi Sunak and the right-wing press: heading for divorce?
Talking Point The Telegraph launches 'assault' on PM just as many Tory MPs are contemplating losing their seats
By Keumars Afifi-Sabet, The Week UK Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
How the biggest election year in history might play out
The Explainer Votes in world's biggest democracies, as well as its most 'despotic' and 'stressed' countries, face threats of violence and suppression
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published